[Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet?

Jonathan Morton chromatix99 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 23 15:30:29 EDT 2014


There is no such indication, unless you examine the packets before and
after each potential point. But you don't generally need one. It is enough
to know that congestion exists somewhere on the path.

- Jonathan Morton
 On 23 Aug 2014 21:17, "Jerry Jongerius" <jerryj at duckware.com> wrote:

> Request for comments on: www.duckware.com/darkaqm
>
> The bottom line: How do you know which AQM device in a network
> intentionally
> drops a packet, without cooperation from AQM?
>
> Or is this in AQM somewhere and I just missed it?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20140823/822057f4/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Bloat mailing list