[Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet?

Jerry Jongerius jerryj at duckware.com
Fri Aug 29 12:54:13 EDT 2014


The additive increase is there in the raw data.

 

From: Jonathan Morton [mailto:chromatix99 at gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 12:31 PM
To: Jerry Jongerius
Cc: bloat
Subject: RE: [Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet?

 

> A ‘boost’ has never been seen.  Bandwidth graphs where there is no packet loss look like:

That's very odd, if true. Westwood+ should still be increasing the congestion window additively after recovering, so even if it got the bandwidth or latency estimates wrong, it should still recover full performance. Not necessarily very quickly, but it should still be visible on a timescale of several seconds.

More likely is that you're conflating cause and effect. The packet is only lost when the boost ends, so if for some reason the boost never ends, the packet is never lost.

- Jonathan Morton

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20140829/f0073975/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Bloat mailing list