[Bloat] The Dark Problem with AQM in the Internet?

[Kenyon Ralph]

On 2014-08-28T20:00:54+0200, Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 06:35 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> > When a message is lost due to an error, how do you determine whose fault
> > it is?
> 
> Links need to be engineered for the optimum combination of power,
> bandwidth, overhead and residual error that meets requirements. I agree
> with your implied point that a single error is unlikely to be indicative
> of a real problem, but a link not meeting requirements is someone's fault.
> 
> So like Jerry I'd be interested in an ability for endpoints to be able
> to collect statistics on per-hop loss probabilities so that admins can
> hold their providers accountable.

Here is some relevant work:
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2417573
"Measurement and Analysis of Internet Interconnection and Congestion"

-- 
Kenyon Ralph
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20140828/43053d91/attachment-0001.sig>