[Bloat] SO_SNDBUF and SO_RCVBUF

[Simon Barber]

Wouldn't the LOWAT setting be much easier for applications to use if it was 
set in estimated time (ie time it will take to deliver the data) rather 
than bytes?

Simon

Sent with AquaMail for Android
http://www.aqua-mail.com


On April 22, 2015 2:47:34 PM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 14:05 -0700, Rick Jones wrote:
> > On 04/22/2015 02:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Yeah, the real nice thing is TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT added in linux-3.12
> >
> > Don't go telling Dave about that, he wants me to put too much into
> > netperf as it is!-)
>
> Note that one can also set a sysctl, in case netperf author does not
> want to change its baby ;)
>
> echo 131072 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_notsent_lowat
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat