[Bloat] the dslreports png

David Lang david at lang.hm
Tue Apr 28 16:24:02 EDT 2015


On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, jb wrote:

> I agree! but I don't want to rush. What latency should substitute? average?
> median? latency during upload? download? both? should it be the excess over
> idle ping, expressed as a multiplier? an absolute value?

an absolute value of excess over idle (see the other discussion about jitter)

median +- range would be ideal as that could cover both upload and download

> Most people as in 98% of people who use this test do so without any
> reference to instructions the forums or anything else and all of them
> "expect" to see latency
> pings that are similar to speedtest.net measure of how close the speed test
> server is.

In this case, we need something like:

latency
base + value[+-] loaded

David Lang

> And I haven't even sorted out the latency bugs. I just now asked the nginx
> development list why IE11 has problems doing http pings because it does
> a weird two-step of high-normal-high-normal, but when talking to nginx only!
> it behaves ok when talking to google.com.
>
> There is a jsfiddle you can play with to see the problem (I hope!)
>   http://jsfiddle.net/qe44nbwh/
> change nginx.org to google.com, using IE11. (other browsers work fine)
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:23 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> http://dfkrkqaqb1zsx.cloudfront.net/speedtest/cdn/377727.png
>>
>> is showing the base latency without load. It would be more effective
>> if it showed the
>> latency with load.
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


More information about the Bloat mailing list