[Bloat] [aqm] the cisco pie patent and IETF IPR filing

[Steinar H. Gunderson]

On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 12:24:03PM -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> disagree with me, thinking that aqm + ecn alone is safe to deploy, and
> obviously I promote fq_codel derived stuff on routers (and sch_fq on
> well protected servers), far more than pie, although I am careful to
> maintain that I can´t wait to see pie (without ecn) on cablemodems one
> day RSN.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by “well protected”? I usually recommend
sch_fq for end hosts pretty much uncritically, so if there's a snag, I'd love
to hear about it.

/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/