[Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in

[jb]

Hi Dave, Is that rrul_be test stealing upload capacity because the Comcast
scatter graph shows some distinctly popular upload bands for their
different products: 12mbit, 6mbt, 24mbit, but your test is very low for
upload.
Some people on linux with firefox got completely tripped up by the realtime
graphs, they seem to choke up the browser, and that ruins the speed. I
thought I'd fixed the test to be as light as possible on linux+firefox but
maybe not?

> This was a test taken *during* a 2 minute rrul_be test.
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320377

On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 6:38 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:

> This was a test taken *during* a 2 minute rrul_be test.
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320377
>
> Flient (formerly netperf-wrapper) data here:
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/lorna-wifi.tgz
>
> Puzzle over this!
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/lorna-wifi/reconcile_this.png and
> the rawer data.... in comparison to this and other of these new
> speedtest reports.
>
> There are a couple other tests of the same link in the  same
> configuration (laptop on lap 10 feet from the access point through a
> wall) [1] in the same dir testing upload and download (without
> simultaneously running the new dslreport tests)
>
> CDF plots are nice. So are mountain plots.
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/lorna-wifi/wifi_download.png
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [1] I was trying for comfort^H^H^H^H^^H^H^H^Hrealism
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> > This test was taken on linux, about 20 feet and one room away from the
> > access point:
> >
> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320328
> >
> > This was taken on the same box, about 10 feet and one room from the
> > access point.
> >
> > http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320340
> >
> > In all cases, the uplink is a comcast box configured for 55Mbit down,
> > 5Mbit up and just to make it weird this is a two router configuration,
> > where the nearest hop is over a powerline box (TP600) before hitting
> > the net.
> >
> > I *like* that the test does not let you switch browser tabs (something
> > I do instinctively when something takes longer than 3 seconds.)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Folks,
> >>
> >> I am delighted to pass along the news that Justin has added latency
> measurements into the Speed Test at DSLReports.com.
> >>
> >> Go to: https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest and click the button for
> your Internet link. This controls the number of simultaneous connections
> that get established between your browser and the speedtest server. After
> you run the test, click the green "Results + Share" button to see detailed
> info. For the moment, you need to be logged in to see the latency results.
> There's a "register" link on each page.
> >>
> >> The speed test measures latency using websocket pings: Justin says that
> a zero-latency link can give 1000 Hz - faster than a full HTTP ping. I just
> ran a test and got 48 msec latency from DSLReports, while ping gstatic.com
> gave 38-40 msec, so they're pretty fast.
> >>
> >> You can leave feedback on this page -
> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29910594-FYI-for-general-feedback-on-the-new-speedtest
> - or wait 'til Justin creates a new Bufferbloat topic on the forums.
> >>
> >> Enjoy!
> >>
> >> Rich
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dave Täht
> > Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
> >
> > https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150419/e312e41a/attachment-0003.html>