[Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in
jb
justin at dslr.net
Thu Apr 23 16:19:43 EDT 2015
> It's actually remarkably un-bloated...
I have seen a number of remarkably unbloated comcast tests
including this one at gigabit symmetric:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/348305
which I know is someone testing their future products.
Unfortunately I have no visibility as to the hardware in use in each test,
and should really ask when such a result floats past. Put up a big box
begging them to fill out a little survey.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se>
wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> justin:
>>
>> thx for nuking the log scale. that makes the bloat much more visible
>> here (typical cablemodem)
>>
>> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322800
>>
>> I am puzzled as to my post fq_codel result here at T+40 and will have
>> to repeat...
>>
>> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322992
>>
>
> This is my DOCSIS3 250/50 connection:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/349547
>
> During the evenings (as it was when I tested now) I seem to not get over
> 100-150 megabit/s downstream, indicating it's saturating on the coax
> segment at peak usage. I should probably get a newer modem, mine is a few
> years old.
>
> It's actually remarkably un-bloated...
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150424/afd41499/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Bloat
mailing list