[Bloat] Graph of bloat

[Dave Taht]

>> Judging from that graphic... I don't think huff and puff was designed for
>> the bufferbloated era! so the question remains, in hal's tests, did ntp
>> adjust the clock backwards?
>
> No.  The system that collected that data was getting time from a good local GPS clock.  It helps to have a place to stand if you want to collect time data.
>
> Here is a typical pattern from a system using the pool without any huff-n-puff while I did a big download.
>  8 Jul 22:02:17 ntpd[26705]: 0.0.0.0 061c 0c clock_step -0.259747 s
>  8 Jul 23:06:24 ntpd[26705]: 0.0.0.0 061c 0c clock_step +0.274448 s

OK, so, out there, on the billions of machines that dnsmasq runs on,
some are crashing when this happens.

I don't think I am satisified with the solutions.

http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2015q3/009701.html


>
>
> --
> These are my opinions.  I hate spam.
>
>
>



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast