[Bloat] Bloat goes away, but with ~25% speed loss?

[Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant]

On 05/06/2015 18:51, Adrian Kennard wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 18:48, Dave Taht wrote:
>> So I am curious as to how well A&A's AS20712 (?) clients are doing on
>> the new dslreports.com/speedtest, which shows the "bloat" grade and
>> actual behavior over time?
> As I say, we try not to be a factor in buffering, so would be
> interesting to see. I suspect it is the equipment at bottlenecks (DSL
> modems) that are the biggest concern apart from endpoints. Our logic
> tries to stop any downlink kit being a buffering point by use of a
> policer though, and that seems to work.
>
It was the uplink side and the recent adoption of Zyxel kit which made me wonder out loud to AA-Andrew earlier today regarding A&A bufferbloat experiences/testing on that side of things with the new modems.  You're an ISP that would have some clue in that regard and hence hopefully a bit of clout with the OEM to do things right (see baby jumbo frames support)  It's me being curious again...sorry!

Kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4791 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150605/5ca5fc4d/attachment-0002.bin>