[Bloat] [aqm] ping loss "considered harmful"

[Fred Baker (fred)]

> On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:57 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> How can we fix this user perception, short of re-prioritizing ping in
> sqm-scripts?

IMHO, ping should go at the same priority as general traffic - the default class, DSCP=0. When I send one, I am asking whether a random packet can get to a given address and get a response back. I can imagine having a command-line parameter to set the DSCP to another value of my choosing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150303/dc03e417/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20150303/dc03e417/attachment-0001.sig>