[Bloat] dslreports bufferbloat tests

jb justinbeech at gmail.com
Tue Apr 5 23:19:14 EDT 2016


I take your point regarding Quality

but both your examples in the post show A+ quality?

I'm thinking that packet loss significant enough to show as a "C" or
worse is mostly a bad situation
even if avoiding all packet loss - by using huge buffers - is
definitely a disaster..


On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Brandon Applegate <brandon at burn.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2016, at 9:04 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Does anyone know what the "quality" portion of dslreport's metric means?
>>
>> Basically - packet loss.
>>
>> https://www.dslreports.com/faq/17930
>
> Sigh. I ranted. I might rant harder.
>
> http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/bufferbloat_vs_quality/
>
>>
>>>> Quality Grades
>>
>> Quality refers to average detected packet loss / re-transmit percentages during download phase. The higher the packet loss / re-transmit percentage the more inefficient the connection is, and a very poor result may be indicative of congestion, inside wiring issues or other problems that need addressing.
>>
>> 1% or less - A+
>> 2.5% or less - A
>> 3% or less - B
>> 5% or less - C
>> 12% or less - D
>> over 12% - F
>>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


More information about the Bloat mailing list