[Bloat] the "ietf" accord bof

[Jonathan Morton]

> On 8 Apr, 2016, at 05:51, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The session was closed by
> ted hardie's refresher of how rfc791's original use case, but the
> slides don't do it justice.

It’s perhaps worth remembering that RFC791 defined the TOS/Precedence bits as end-to-end stable, a property explicitly removed by Diffserv.  Of all of Diffserv’s failings, I think this has become the most troublesome.

 - Jonathan Morton