[Bloat] [Make-wifi-fast] graphing airtime fairness in wifi

[David Lang]

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, David Lang wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> I have been sitting here looking at wifi air packet captures off and
>> on for years now, trying to come up with a representation, over time,
>> of what the actual airtime usage (and one day, fairness) would look
>> like. Believe me, looking at the captures is no fun, and (for example)
>> wireshark tends to misinterpret unreceived retries at different rates
>> inside a txop as tcp retries (which, while educational, makes it hard
>> to see actual retries)...
>>
>> Finally today, I found a conceptual model that "fits" - and it's kind
>> of my hope that something already out there does this from packet
>> captures. (?) Certainly there are lots of great pie chart tools out
>> there...
>>
>> Basically you start with a pie chart representing a fixed amount of
>> time - say, 128ms. Then for each device transmitting you assign a
>> slice of the pie for the amount of airtime used. Then, you can show
>> the amount of data transmitted in that piece of the pie by increasing
>> the volume plotted for that slice of the pie. And you sweep around
>> continually (like a radar scanning or a timepiece's pointer) to show
>> progress over time, and you show multicast and other traffic as eating
>> the whole pie for however long it lasts.
>>
>> conceptually it looks a bit like this:
>>
>> http://blog.cerowrt.org/images/fairness.png  (I borrowed this graph
>> from 
> http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/11/easily-create-stunning-animated-charts-with-chart-js/
>> )
>>
>> Another way to do it would be to have the pie represent all the
>> stations on the network, and to have the "sweep hand" jump between
>> them...
>
> does it really matter how much data is passed during the timeslice as opposed 
> to 
> just how much airtime is used? (and there will be a large chunk of airtime 
> unused for various reasons, much of which you will not be able to attribute 
> to 
> any one station, and if you do get full transmit data from each station, you 
> can end up with >100% airtime use attempted)
>
> I would be looking at a stacked area graph to show changes over time (a 
> particular source will come and go over time)
>
> I would either do two graphs, one showing data successfully transmitted, the 
> other showing airtime used (keeping colors/order matching between the two 
> graphs), or if you have few enough stations, one graph with good lines 
> between 
> the stations and have the color represent the % of theoretical peak data 
> transmission to show the relative efficiency of the different stations.
>
>
> While the radar sweep updating of a pie graph is a neat graphic, it doesn't 
> really let you see what's happening over time.

If you are looking for visualization that shows you what's talking to what, with 
what volume of packets of what size, take a look at.

https://it.wiki.usu.edu/OIP

David Lang