[Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available

Dave Täht dave at taht.net
Thu Dec 8 08:22:35 EST 2016


drop tail works better than any single queue aqm in this scenario.


On 12/8/16 12:24 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
> 
>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184
> 
> "BBR converges toward a fair share of the bottleneck bandwidth whether
> competing with other BBR flows or with loss-based congestion control."
> 
> That's not what I took away from your tests of having BBR and Cubic
> flows together, where BBR just killed Cubic dead.
> 
> What has changed since? Have you re-done your tests with whatever has
> changed, I must have missed that? Or did I misunderstand?
> 



More information about the Bloat mailing list