[Bloat] TCP BBR paper is now generally available
Dave Täht
dave at taht.net
Thu Dec 8 08:22:35 EST 2016
drop tail works better than any single queue aqm in this scenario.
On 12/8/16 12:24 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2016, Dave Taht wrote:
>
>> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=3022184
>
> "BBR converges toward a fair share of the bottleneck bandwidth whether
> competing with other BBR flows or with loss-based congestion control."
>
> That's not what I took away from your tests of having BBR and Cubic
> flows together, where BBR just killed Cubic dead.
>
> What has changed since? Have you re-done your tests with whatever has
> changed, I must have missed that? Or did I misunderstand?
>
More information about the Bloat
mailing list