[Bloat] Hardware upticks

Stephen Hemminger stephen at networkplumber.org
Tue Jan 5 19:06:03 EST 2016


The expensive part is often having to save and restore all the state in
registers and other bits on context switch.


On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Steinar H. Gunderson <sgunderson at bigfoot.com
> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:36:10PM -0600, Benjamin Cronce wrote:
> > You can't have different virtual memory space and not take some large
> > switching overhead without devoting a lot of transistors to massive
> caches.
> > And the larger the caches, the higher the latency.
>
> I'm sure you already know this, but just to add to what you're saying:
> Modern CPUs actually have cache-line tagging tricks so that they don't have
> to blow the entire L1 just because you do a context switch. It would be too
> expensive.
>
> /* Steinar */
> --
> Homepage: https://www.sesse.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20160105/993bd9c5/attachment.html>


More information about the Bloat mailing list