[Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

[Brandon Applegate]

> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Brandon,
> 
> One more (very) simple test - what are your speeds *without* any SQM/shaping? I didn't see it mentioned in your report, and let's be sure that you're shaping the traffic to the actual achievable link speeds...
> 
> I recently helped a friend whose "15 mbps/1mbps" DSL just wouldn't get above ~725kbps up without inducing latency/bloat. It turns out that the uplink could only achieve 3/4 of its "rated" speed.
> 

I get the advertised 30mbit down / 5mbit up.  This is doing one test at a time.  Obviously because of induced latency / bufferbloat - I can tell if my wife is uploading a bunch of pictures somewhere (my ssh sessions get very choppy).  But my vanilla speeds are exactly what I would expect.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20160120/bf17df9e/attachment.sig>