[Bloat] Publicly shaming those that can't respond back

[Juliusz Chroboczek]

> May? May? oneofmystillannoyedcorrespondents at conman.org is right for being
> annoyed at you, because there's no "may" about sending email to this list
> (or to you, Dave).  It's TLS or pack sand to Gmail

Dave, I think he's right.  Out of two evils, allowing non-encrypted mail
is preferable (and less hostile) than forcing people to hold their mail on
Google's servers.

-- Juliusz