[Bloat] Getting started with sqm-scripts - latency good, bandwidth decimated

[Simon Barber]

Last I looked at this you can attach a qdisc to a virtual interface, but 
there is no backpressure, since the interface is virtual and the real 
interface it feeds will never 'stop' accepting packets (since you are 
really feeding into another qdisc).

So you can do things like rate pacing, logging, etc.

Simon


On 1/19/2016 4:09 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 20 Jan, 2016, at 01:33, Brandon Applegate <brandon at burn.net> wrote:
>>
>> My topology is ‘on a stick’.  I have one gig interface to a managed switch, on which are eth0.666 (outside/wan) and eth0.10 (inside).
>>
>> No matter what I do - my bandwidth is 10% of what it should be.  I get approx. 3/4mbit down + 2/3mbit up on dslreports speedtest.  Bufferbloat looks great though - A+.
>>
>> Is there something inherent I’m doing wrong ?  Something to do with my ‘on a stick’ topology biting me ?
> I’m not sure whether a qdisc can be attached to a virtualised interface in this way.  Can you run ‘tc -s qdisc’ and show us the output?
>
>   - Jonathan Morton
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat