[Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)

Aaron Wood woody77 at gmail.com
Wed Aug 30 01:15:42 EDT 2017


I don't have a full writeup yet, but wanted to ask if people on here have
run into this.

I'm seeing a disparity between flent and the dslreports speed tests.  On my
connection at home (Comcast 150/12), I figured it was something related to
the test implementations, but minor.  But on a connect at a friend with
business-class Comcast (300/12), we're seeing a huge difference.  Flent
can't seem to achieve more than 120Mbps, often with an early, couple-second
hump at a much higher speed.  But dslreports' speed tests gets the full
300Mbps.

In looking closer at my connection, with sqm (cake) turned off, I'm seeing
~180Mbps download with 500ms of bufferbloat when I use the dslreports test (
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/20805152).

Yet flent can't come close to that, even with the tcp_12down test:

​
The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic
class, or the ports that traffic are running on.  I've ruled out the ping
streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same
120Mbps roof.

It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port
80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing
deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer).

-Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20170830/0f625992/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: raw.totals.png
Type: image/png
Size: 257944 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20170830/0f625992/attachment.png>


More information about the Bloat mailing list