[Bloat] DETNET

[Matthias Tafelmeier]

On 11/15/2017 08:31 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>> Well, if it's already for specific HW, then I'd prefer to see RDMA in place
>> right away with getting rid of IRQs and other TCP/IP specific rust along the
>> way, at least for DC realms :) Although, this HULL might has a spin for it from
>> economics perspective. 
> It would be good for more to read the proceeds from the recent netdev
> conference:
>
> https://lwn.net/Articles/738912/
>
Especially ...


        "TCP Issues (Eric Dumazet)

At 100gbit speeds with large round trip times we hit very serious
scalability issues in the TCP stack.

Particularly, retransmit queues of senders perform quite poorly. It has
always been a simple linked list."

goes in line with the aforementioned.


-- 
Besten Gruß

Matthias Tafelmeier

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20171118/ccae36a6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x8ADF343B.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4729 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20171118/ccae36a6/attachment.key>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 538 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20171118/ccae36a6/attachment.sig>