[Bloat] Fwd: [Bug 1436945] Re: devel: consider fq_codel as the default qdisc for networking

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Thu Aug 16 17:08:31 EDT 2018

On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 12:49 AM Jonathan Morton <chromatix99 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5 Jun, 2018, at 10:44 am, Mario Hock <mario.hock at kit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Just to make sure that I got your answer correctly. The benefit for endsystems comes from the "fq" (flow queuing) part, not from the "codel" part of fq_codel?
> That's a fair characterisation, yes.
> In fact, even for middleboxes, the "flow isolation" semantics of FQ have the most impact on reducing inter-flow induced latency.  The "codel" part (AQM) helps with intra-flow latency, which is usually much less important once flow isolation is in place, but is still worth having.

So, jonathan, this portion of the debate leaked over into

And I lost a great deal of hair over it. the codel portion is way
worth it on "end-systems".

>  - Jonathan Morton
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
Tel: 1-669-226-2619

More information about the Bloat mailing list