[Bloat] vendor status-s for bufferbloat solutions

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Thu Feb 8 15:10:09 EST 2018


It would be nice to have a set of official statements from vendors
regarding their bufferbloat solutions vis a vis the various RFCs
(notably rfc8290) before the ietf blog entry goes out.

My interchange with the tomahawk 3 guy was fruitless. Apple's kind
of exited the router market. Cable manufacturers are obligated to
implement docsis-pie in 3.1. Microsoft has made a big push recently to
modernize their TCPs. A bunch of router makers did embrace fq_codel
(calling it various things like streamboost, adaptive qos, etc), and a
few calling it what it is notably evenroute, and ubnt in their
edgerouter products, sophos, all of lede/openwrt/asuswrt/etc... but
I'm still unaware of any implementations on ONTs, CMTSes, DSLAMs, DSL
firmwares, MOCA...

What I kind of envision is everybody here annoying their favorite
forums for their favorite product and asking what of the outputs of
the ietf aqm working group they planned to implement.

-- 

Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619


More information about the Bloat mailing list