[Bloat] excellent result with OpenWrt 18.06.1 + CAKE on FTTH
Dave Taht
dave.taht at gmail.com
Mon Nov 12 10:55:35 EST 2018
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 7:38 AM Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike at swm.pp.se> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > tc -s qdisc show dev your_device?
> > tc -s qdisc show dev your_ifbdevice?
>
> I haven't restarted in 40 days and I don't remember restarting cake, so
> this should be several weeks of data.
>
> qdisc cake 8031: dev eth1.2 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 100Mbit besteffort
> triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms raw
Pretty nice. There is not much need for it, but it would be interesting to know
how much cpu overhead a full set of uploads with and without the
ack-filter enabled
at 100Mbit with this arch takes.
> overhead 0
> Sent 70822286277 bytes 202513660 pkt (dropped 13984, overlimits 25350421
> requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> memory used: 5156288b of 5000000b
> capacity estimate: 100Mbit
> min/max network layer size: 42 / 1514
> min/max overhead-adjusted size: 42 / 1514
> average network hdr offset: 14
>
> Tin 0
> thresh 100Mbit
> target 5.0ms
> interval 100.0ms
> pk_delay 4us
> av_delay 1us
> sp_delay 1us
> backlog 0b
> pkts 202527644
> bytes 70842325936
Don't use this connection much, do you? :)
> way_inds 4939006
> way_miss 11834545
> way_cols 0
> drops 13984
It's nice to know AQM is still needed at these speeds.
> marks 512
and that you have at least one device with ecn enabled. Would this be
OSX or IOS perhaps?
> ack_drop 0
And how many ack-drops you get.
> sp_flows 2
> bk_flows 1
> un_flows 0
> max_len 28766
I really hate GRO. At 100Mbit, without splitting, that's 2.5ms of
jitter. I've had a long held dream of being able to do the "jamophone"
with less than 2.5ms latency end-2-end across town, with multichannel
48khz 24 bit audio... at 130us, that leaves some room for the encoder.
I don't suppose you have someone else "across town" you could run some
benchmarks against?
I did a extremely successful test of sonic's fiber network in SF where
I got well under 2.5ms jitter for an 8 channel stream... then I left
SF. :(
I was kind of expecting 64k, though, here.
> quantum 1514
>
> qdisc ingress ffff: dev eth1.2 parent ffff:fff1 ----------------
> Sent 807912654344 bytes 631652827 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues
> 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> qdisc cake 8032: dev ifb4eth1.2 root refcnt 2 bandwidth 250Mbit besteffort
> triple-isolate nonat nowash no-ack-filter split-gso rtt 100.0ms raw
> overhead 0
Similarly, a cpu number under load. I note here, that splitting GSO
has a big cost, (primarily in routing table lookup) and you can at
these speeds, probably disable it.
ack filtering will not help.
> Sent 829571211610 bytes 631641016 pkt (dropped 11811, overlimits
> 790055554 requeues 0)
> backlog 0b 0p requeues 0
> memory used: 4540528b of 12500000b
> capacity estimate: 250Mbit
> min/max network layer size: 60 / 1514
> min/max overhead-adjusted size: 60 / 1514
> average network hdr offset: 14
>
> Tin 0
> thresh 250Mbit
> target 5.0ms
> interval 100.0ms
> pk_delay 1.2ms
> av_delay 559us
> sp_delay 1us
> backlog 0b
> pkts 631652827
> bytes 829588333230
> way_inds 12061686
> way_miss 12913211
> way_cols 1
> drops 11811
> marks 3589
> ack_drop 0
> sp_flows 1
> bk_flows 1
> un_flows 0
> max_len 38444
I was also expecting 64k here. I imagine you are using modern linuxes
that don't overuse TSO anymore,
and osx and windows never got into it to the extreme that linux did.
> quantum 1514
>
>
>
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
More information about the Bloat
mailing list