[Bloat] [Ecn-sane] sce materials from ietf

[Pete Heist]

> On Dec 2, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Dave Taht <dave at taht.net> wrote:
> 
> I do hate watching y'all continually concede the "latency" point and
> have to argue on the "chosen ground" of single or dualq about
> long-running tcp flows. 

I don’t think we’ve conceded that. It would be possible to run more tests on a LAN with a shorter Codel interval and show ~1ms TCP RTT, and perhaps we should. I don’t think there's any fundamental reason why one signaling mechanism or the other should ultimately be any better in this regard.