[Bloat] pacing, applied differently than bbr

David Fridovich-Keil dfk at berkeley.edu
Sun Feb 9 13:21:35 EST 2020


Hi Dave,

To be honest I haven’t personally been involved in follow up work but I think my coauthors may have. Maybe try contacting Nate at nate.hanford at gmail.com?

Best,
David

Sent from my iPhone

> On Feb 9, 2020, at 2:12 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't know how I stumbled across this, but it seemed interesting at
> this late hour. I wonder if they kept at it or tried ecn also.
> 
> "A Model Predictive Control Approach to Flow Pacing for TCP"
> 
> "we propose a different approach to latency based congestion control.
> In particular, our controller sets the maximum pacing rate by solving
> a model-based receding horizon control problem at each time step. Each
> new roundtrip time (RTT) measurement is first incorporated into a
> linear time-varying (LTV) predictive model. Subsequently, we solve a
> one-step look-ahead optimization problem which finds the pacing rate
> which optimally trades off RTT, RTT variance, and throughput according
> to the most recent model. Our method is computationally inexpensive
> making it readily implementable on current systems."
> 
> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~dfk/pdfs/network_control_camera_ready.pdf
> 
> 
> -- 
> Make Music, Not War
> 
> Dave Täht
> CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> http://www.teklibre.com
> Tel: 1-831-435-0729



More information about the Bloat mailing list