[Bloat] starlink testing

Michael Richardson mcr at sandelman.ca
Tue Apr 20 12:03:30 EDT 2021


Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
    > As much as I dislike the cgnat I don't see how starlink had any other
    > choice, and the layer below that is hopefully capable of carrying
    > ipv6 well.

IPv6 first, with NAT64 would have been significantly better and easier.



More information about the Bloat mailing list