[Bloat] [Cake] [Make-wifi-fast] [Starlink] [Cerowrt-devel] Due Aug 2: Internet Quality workshop CFP for the internet architecture board

[Bob McMahon]

We find four nodes, a primary BSS and an adjunct one quite good for lots of
testing.  The six nodes allows for a primary BSS and two adjacent ones. We
want to minimize complexity to necessary and sufficient.

The challenge we find is having variability (e.g. montecarlos) that's
reproducible and has relevant information. Basically, the distance matrices
have h-matrices as their elements. Our chips can provide these h-matrices.

The parts for solid state programmable attenuators and phase shifters
aren't very expensive. A device that supports a five branch tree and 2x2
MIMO seems a very good starting point.

Bob

On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 4:55 PM Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com> wrote:

> On 8/2/21 4:16 PM, David Lang wrote:
> > If you are going to setup a test environment for wifi, you need to
> include the ability to make a fe cases that only happen with RF, not with
> wired networks and
> > are commonly overlooked
> >
> > 1. station A can hear station B and C but they cannot hear each other
> > 2. station A can hear station B but station B cannot hear station A 3.
> station A can hear that station B is transmitting, but not with a strong
> enough signal to
> > decode the signal (yes in theory you can work around interference, but
> in practice interference is still a real thing)
> >
> > David Lang
> >
>
> To add to this, I think you need lots of different station devices,
> different capabilities (/n, /ac, /ax, etc)
> different numbers of spatial streams, and different distances from the
> AP.  From download queueing perspective, changing
> the capabilities may be sufficient while keeping all stations at same
> distance.  This assumes you are not
> actually testing the wifi rate-ctrl alg. itself, so different throughput
> levels for different stations would be enough.
>
> So, a good station emulator setup (and/or pile of real stations) and a few
> RF chambers and
> programmable attenuators and you can test that setup...
>
>  From upload perspective, I guess same setup would do the job.
> Queuing/fairness might depend a bit more on the
> station devices, emulated or otherwise, but I guess a clever AP could
> enforce fairness in upstream direction
> too by implementing per-sta queues.
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
> --
> Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
> Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com
>

-- 
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted 
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for 
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy 
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are 
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the 
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, 
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of 
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and 
destroy any printed copy of it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20210802/d10172d5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4206 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20210802/d10172d5/attachment-0001.bin>