[Bloat] Updated Bufferbloat Test

[Dave Taht]

and with the sqmscripts off?

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 9:29 PM Kenneth Porter <shiva at sewingwitch.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/24/2021 2:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> >
> > I'll try to remember to run this from my office tonight when nobody's
> > around. We've got a 50 Mbps fiber connection with AT&T and I'm using
> > fq_codel on a CentOS 7 system for the SQM. That should be interesting.
>
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=494dbe95-5302-4e1c-84cd-fbb4c8871ea2
>
> This is after restarting the sqm-scripts. I got initial bad results and
> looked at the debug log and found that the iptables commands were
> failing to get a lock during system boot to set up the mangle table. I
> think it's competing with firewalld and fail2ban and losing. I don't see
> any lock errors from the restart and now the test shows good bloat results.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat



-- 
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman

dave at taht.net <Dave Täht> CTO, TekLibre, LLC Tel: 1-831-435-0729