[Bloat] [Starlink] [Make-wifi-fast] [Cerowrt-devel] Due Aug 2: Internet Quality workshop CFP for the internet architecture board
Ben Greear
greearb at candelatech.com
Tue Jul 6 09:46:38 EDT 2021
Hello,
I am interested to hear wish lists for network testing features. We make test equipment, supporting lots
of wifi stations and a distributed architecture, with built-in udp, tcp, ipv6, http, ... protocols,
and open to creating/improving some of our automated tests.
I know Dave has some test scripts already, so I'm not necessarily looking to reimplement that,
but more fishing for other/new ideas.
Thanks,
Ben
On 7/2/21 4:28 PM, Bob McMahon wrote:
> I think we need the language of math here. It seems like the network power metric, introduced by Kleinrock and Jaffe in the late 70s, is something useful.
> Effective end/end queue depths per Little's law also seems useful. Both are available in iperf 2 from a test perspective. Repurposing test techniques to actual
> traffic could be useful. Hence the question around what exact telemetry is useful to apps making socket write() and read() calls.
>
> Bob
>
> On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 10:07 AM Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> In terms of trying to find "Quality" I have tried to encourage folk to
> both read "zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance"[0], and Deming's
> work on "total quality management".
>
> My own slice at this network, computer and lifestyle "issue" is aiming
> for "imperceptible latency" in all things. [1]. There's a lot of
> fallout from that in terms of not just addressing queuing delay, but
> caching, prefetching, and learning more about what a user really needs
> (as opposed to wants) to know via intelligent agents.
>
> [0] If you want to get depressed, read Pirsig's successor to "zen...",
> lila, which is in part about what happens when an engineer hits an
> insoluble problem.
> [1] https://www.internetsociety.org/events/latency2013/ <https://www.internetsociety.org/events/latency2013/>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 6:16 PM David P. Reed <dpreed at deepplum.com <mailto:dpreed at deepplum.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Well, nice that the folks doing the conference are willing to consider that quality of user experience has little to do with signalling rate at the
> physical layer or throughput of FTP transfers.
> >
> >
> >
> > But honestly, the fact that they call the problem "network quality" suggests that they REALLY, REALLY don't understand the Internet isn't the hardware or
> the routers or even the routing algorithms *to its users*.
> >
> >
> >
> > By ignoring the diversity of applications now and in the future, and the fact that we DON'T KNOW what will be coming up, this conference will likely fall
> into the usual trap that net-heads fall into - optimizing for some imaginary reality that doesn't exist, and in fact will probably never be what users
> actually will do given the chance.
> >
> >
> >
> > I saw this issue in 1976 in the group developing the original Internet protocols - a desire to put *into the network* special tricks to optimize ASR33
> logins to remote computers from terminal concentrators (aka remote login), bulk file transfers between file systems on different time-sharing systems, and
> "sessions" (virtual circuits) that required logins. And then trying to exploit underlying "multicast" by building it into the IP layer, because someone
> thought that TV broadcast would be the dominant application.
> >
> >
> >
> > Frankly, to think of "quality" as something that can be "provided" by "the network" misses the entire point of "end-to-end argument in system design".
> Quality is not a property defined or created by The Network. If you want to talk about Quality, you need to talk about users - all the users at all times,
> now and into the future, and that's something you can't do if you don't bother to include current and future users talking about what they might expect to
> experience that they don't experience.
> >
> >
> >
> > There was much fighting back in 1976 that basically involved "network experts" saying that the network was the place to "solve" such issues as quality,
> so applications could avoid having to solve such issues.
> >
> >
> >
> > What some of us managed to do was to argue that you can't "solve" such issues. All you can do is provide a framework that enables different uses to
> *cooperate* in some way.
> >
> >
> >
> > Which is why the Internet drops packets rather than queueing them, and why diffserv cannot work.
> >
> > (I know the latter is conftroversial, but at the moment, ALL of diffserv attempts to talk about end-to-end applicaiton specific metrics, but never, ever
> explains what the diffserv control points actually do w.r.t. what the IP layer can actually control. So it is meaningless - another violation of the
> so-called end-to-end principle).
> >
> >
> >
> > Networks are about getting packets from here to there, multiplexing the underlying resources. That's it. Quality is a whole different thing. Quality can
> be improved by end-to-end approaches, if the underlying network provides some kind of thing that actually creates a way for end-to-end applications to
> affect queueing and routing decisions, and more importantly getting "telemetry" from the network regarding what is actually going on with the other
> end-to-end users sharing the infrastructure.
> >
> >
> >
> > This conference won't talk about it this way. So don't waste your time.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, June 30, 2021 8:12pm, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht at gmail.com <mailto:dave.taht at gmail.com>> said:
> >
> > > The program committee members are *amazing*. Perhaps, finally, we can
> > > move the bar for the internet's quality metrics past endless, blind
> > > repetitions of speedtest.
> > >
> > > For complete details, please see:
> > > https://www.iab.org/activities/workshops/network-quality/ <https://www.iab.org/activities/workshops/network-quality/>
> > >
> > > Submissions Due: Monday 2nd August 2021, midnight AOE (Anywhere On Earth)
> > > Invitations Issued by: Monday 16th August 2021
> > >
> > > Workshop Date: This will be a virtual workshop, spread over three days:
> > >
> > > 1400-1800 UTC Tue 14th September 2021
> > > 1400-1800 UTC Wed 15th September 2021
> > > 1400-1800 UTC Thu 16th September 2021
> > >
> > > Workshop co-chairs: Wes Hardaker, Evgeny Khorov, Omer Shapira
> > >
> > > The Program Committee members:
> > >
> > > Jari Arkko, Olivier Bonaventure, Vint Cerf, Stuart Cheshire, Sam
> > > Crowford, Nick Feamster, Jim Gettys, Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen, Geoff
> > > Huston, Cullen Jennings, Katarzyna Kosek-Szott, Mirja Kuehlewind,
> > > Jason Livingood, Matt Mathias, Randall Meyer, Kathleen Nichols,
> > > Christoph Paasch, Tommy Pauly, Greg White, Keith Winstein.
> > >
> > > Send Submissions to: network-quality-workshop-pc at iab.org <mailto:network-quality-workshop-pc at iab.org>.
> > >
> > > Position papers from academia, industry, the open source community and
> > > others that focus on measurements, experiences, observations and
> > > advice for the future are welcome. Papers that reflect experience
> > > based on deployed services are especially welcome. The organizers
> > > understand that specific actions taken by operators are unlikely to be
> > > discussed in detail, so papers discussing general categories of
> > > actions and issues without naming specific technologies, products, or
> > > other players in the ecosystem are expected. Papers should not focus
> > > on specific protocol solutions.
> > >
> > > The workshop will be by invitation only. Those wishing to attend
> > > should submit a position paper to the address above; it may take the
> > > form of an Internet-Draft.
> > >
> > > All inputs submitted and considered relevant will be published on the
> > > workshop website. The organisers will decide whom to invite based on
> > > the submissions received. Sessions will be organized according to
> > > content, and not every accepted submission or invited attendee will
> > > have an opportunity to present as the intent is to foster discussion
> > > and not simply to have a sequence of presentations.
> > >
> > > Position papers from those not planning to attend the virtual sessions
> > > themselves are also encouraged. A workshop report will be published
> > > afterwards.
> > >
> > > Overview:
> > >
> > > "We believe that one of the major factors behind this lack of progress
> > > is the popular perception that throughput is the often sole measure of
> > > the quality of Internet connectivity. With such narrow focus, people
> > > don’t consider questions such as:
> > >
> > > What is the latency under typical working conditions?
> > > How reliable is the connectivity across longer time periods?
> > > Does the network allow the use of a broad range of protocols?
> > > What services can be run by clients of the network?
> > > What kind of IPv4, NAT or IPv6 connectivity is offered, and are there firewalls?
> > > What security mechanisms are available for local services, such as DNS?
> > > To what degree are the privacy, confidentiality, integrity and
> > > authenticity of user communications guarded?
> > >
> > > Improving these aspects of network quality will likely depend on
> > > measurement and exposing metrics to all involved parties, including to
> > > end users in a meaningful way. Such measurements and exposure of the
> > > right metrics will allow service providers and network operators to
> > > focus on the aspects that impacts the users’ experience most and at
> > > the same time empowers users to choose the Internet service that will
> > > give them the best experience."
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Latest Podcast:
> > > https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/ <https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/>
> > >
> > > Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Cerowrt-devel mailing list
> > > Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Cerowrt-devel at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> > > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/cerowrt-devel>
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Latest Podcast:
> https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/ <https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/>
>
> Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Make-wifi-fast mailing list
> Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Make-wifi-fast at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/make-wifi-fast>
>
>
> This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for the use of
> the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise
> restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient,
> you are hereby notified that any use, copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you
> received this e-mail in error, please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and destroy any printed copy of it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Starlink mailing list
> Starlink at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/starlink
>
--
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
More information about the Bloat
mailing list