[Bloat] Terminology for Laypeople

James R Cutler james.cutler at consultant.com
Tue May 4 20:14:38 EDT 2021


Jason,

I find “idle” and “working” to be understandable both individually and as opposites in almost any field or endeavor. These terms also mesh with typical speed test instructions regarding testing under idle conditions without working internet applications.

	James

> On May 4, 2021, at 7:02 PM, Livingood, Jason via Bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> Like many of you I have been immersed in buffer bloat discussions for many years, almost entirely within the technical community. Now that I am starting to explain latency & latency under load to internal non-technical folks, I have noticed some people don’t really understand “traditional” latency vs. latency under load (LUL).
>  
> As a result, I am planning to experiment in some upcoming briefings and call traditional latency “idle latency” – a measure of latency conducted on an otherwise idle connection. And then try calling LUL either “active latency” or perhaps “working latency” (suggested by an external colleague – can’t take credit for that one) – to try to communicate it is latency when the connection is experiencing normal usage.
>  
> Have any of you here faced similar challenges explaining this to non-technical audiences? Have you had any success with alternative terms? What do you think of these?
>  
> Thanks for any input,
> Jason
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net <mailto:Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20210504/1a889874/attachment.html>


More information about the Bloat mailing list