[Bloat] Up-to-date buffer sizes?

[Amr Rizk]

These are some recent Telco measurements (Figure 3) from one of the papers from that workshop

http://buffer-workshop.stanford.edu/papers/paper7.pdf

There on can observe that most flows in Internet are <60 ms. I assume applying Appenzeller's rule is not a bad idea for static buffer sizing. However, as Toke said, AQM is of course better..

Best
Amr

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Bloat <bloat-bounces at lists.bufferbloat.net> Im Auftrag von Toke Høiland-Jørgensen via Bloat
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2022 17:32
An: Michael Menth <menth at uni-tuebingen.de>; bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
Betreff: Re: [Bloat] Up-to-date buffer sizes?

Michael Menth <menth at uni-tuebingen.de> writes:

> Hi all,
>
> are there up-to-date references giving evidence about typical buffer 
> sizes for various link speeds and technologies?

Heh. There was a whole workshop on it a couple of years ago; not sure if it concluded anything: http://buffer-workshop.stanford.edu/program/

But really, asking about buffer sizing is missing the point; if you have static buffers with no other management (like AQM and FQ) you're most likely already doing it wrong... :)

-Toke
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat