[Bloat] Hey, all, what about bandlength?

[Dave Collier-Brown]

Which fits the word "bandlength" better than my discussion, which was an
experiment in explaining that latency has a cost to someone who doesn't
know waht it means.

--dave

On 4/9/23 19:04, David Lang via Bloat wrote:
> TCP ramps up it's speed fairly slowly, and backs off fairly
> drastically when it is told (via ECN or a dropped packet) that it has
> hit the limit. As a result, a single TCP session is not going to fully
> utilize a connection. There are people who do large, high speed
> transfers over long distances on a regular basis (think movie studios
> sending uncompressed movie footage around the world for processing).
> To fully utilize their bandwidth, they use protocols that involve lots
> of connections operating in parallel
>
> David Lang
>
> On Sun, 9 Apr 2023, Dave Collier-Brown via Bloat wrote:
>
>> Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2023 16:06:54 -0400
>> From: Dave Collier-Brown via Bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> Reply-To: Dave Collier-Brown <dave.collier-Brown at indexexchange.com>
>> To: bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> Subject: Re: [Bloat] Hey, all, what about bandlength?
>>
>> Consider a connection to my ISP as being an empty water-pipe, and I
>> only want to measure the flow from the waterworks to me. In this case
>> the waterworks is Rogers in Toronto, and the numbers come from me
>> measuring the link with the Waveform bufferbloat tool.
>>
>> The ISP promises me 1 Gbit/s of water.  OK, there is no such thing,
>> but you get the idea (;-))
>>
>> Let's consider the no-latency case.
>>
>> *   The ISP turns on the tap, and it takes half an RTT to get to me,
>> one way.  Let that be 1 millisecond, 0.001s of delay.
>> *   Once the delay is over, I get (1.0s - 0.001s) * 1 Gbit/s = 0.999
>> Gb/s. The 0.999 seconds is transfer time, and that transfer is at
>> full speed of the pipe, so it adds up to 0.999 Gb/s
>> *   That's pretty good.
>>
>> Now let's consider the best possible case where there is latency, but
>> only one delay of 0.456s.  That basically means that only one
>> transfer happens in the second, so there is only once change for
>> latency to hurt me.
>>
>> *   the one-way delay is still 0.001s, but there is also 0.231s of
>> latency, for a delay of 0.232s
>> *   (1.0s - (0.001s + 0.231s) ) * 1 Gbit/s =
>> *   1.0s - 0.232s = 0.549s  * 1 Gbit/s = 0.768 GB/s
>> *   Cut by a quarter, by one packet's delay
>>
>> What about the worst case?
>>
>> *   It's not worst, but a pretty common case is a busy link with
>> 1500-byte packets
>> *   One packet is 12,000 bits
>> *   In one second we can transfer 1,000,000,000 bits /
>> 12,000bits/packet = 83,333.3 packets
>> *   Maybe that many delays, too?
>> *   Fortunately, no
>>
>> I personally observed 456.2 Mbit/s, about 54% of a gigabit at home,
>> so it's more like the latency cut my bandwidth in half
>>
>> --dave
>>
>>
>> On 4/8/23 22:32, Michael Richardson via Bloat wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dave Collier-Brown
>> <dave.collier-Brown at indexexchange.com><mailto:dave.collier-Brown at indexexchange.com>
>> wrote:
>>   >> Dave Collier-Brown via
>> Bloat<bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net><mailto:bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>   >> They he said "bandlength"
>>   >>
>>   >> > That sounded like an odd name, but the idea was cool:
>>   >>
>>   >> > If I have a bandwidth of 1 Mbit/S, but it takes 2 seconds to
>> deliver
>>   >> 1 > Mbit, do I have a bandlength of only 1/2 Mbit/S?
>>   >>
>>   >> Is that because there is 2seconds of delay?
>>
>>   > Well, 2 seconds elapsed time, 1 of which is delay.
>>
>> Ah, would that include the delay to ask for the data?
>> (A DNS request, or an HTTP GET)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication,
>> including any and all attachments, contains confidential information
>> intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any
>> dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly
>> prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have
>> received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender
>> immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from
>> your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not
>> constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by
>> electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract
>> amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms
>> contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and
>> the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same
>> is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

--
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-brown at indexexchange.com |              -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized signatory.