[Bloat] an internet stress test

[Sebastian Moeller]

Hi Dave,

from Germany (on link sqm-shaped to 105/36 gross rate -> max achievable TCP goodput IPv4: 98.3/33.7, IPv6: 96.9/33.2):



The thing runs pretty short (as most throughput tests) and the latency is measured without load. 
Under Safari te sharing feature seems not to work:
https://wifi.wtf/results/undefined
undefined is not a link 

IMHO the FAQ is amusing and not wrong, the tests has clear visuals, but at the end of the day it seems pretty much a run-of-the-mill throughput test with servers likely only in NA...

The results themselves look OK, if not great, a 120ms path and local cross traffic take their toll.


> On Apr 16, 2023, at 02:23, Dave Taht via Bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> 
> I was aware of this one, but it was not until today that I read the
> faq. Pretty good test. Hilarious FAQ. I would be interested of course
> to see how accurate the test is from various locations?
> 
> https://wifi.wtf/wtfaq/
> 
> -- 
> AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20230416/c81f66d0/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screen Shot 2023-04-16 at 16.49.03.png
Type: image/png
Size: 326369 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat/attachments/20230416/c81f66d0/attachment-0001.png>