[Bloat] Another passive bandwidth estimation method

Dave Taht dave.taht at gmail.com
Tue Aug 1 04:37:25 EDT 2023


On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 1:24 AM Michael Menth <menth at uni-tuebingen.de> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> here is a private copy for personal use:
>
> http://atlas.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/menth/papers/Menth21-Sub-6-accepted.pdf

Very interesting, thank you. So great you have code on github!

I appreciate the mention of cake, and I figure it would scale worse
than fq-pie in the 100Gbit scenario you present, but do not know.
However, it does come with a built in forground (respecting EF, and a
few other diffserv codepoints), and a background service class,
respecting both CS1 and LE, and it would be interesting to know how
that differs from DSCD?

> Kind regards
>
> Michael
>
>
> Am 01.08.2023 um 09:51 schrieb Sebastian Moeller:
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > that "teaser" you wrote is certainly interesting. Would you be able to distribute author copies to those of us that do not subscribe to IEEExplore, please?
> >
> > Regards
> >       Sebastian
> >
> >
> >> On Aug 1, 2023, at 09:32, Michael Menth via Bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> we've recently developed a passive method for finding a link's capacity (in a different context). You find the algorithm in III.B.5 in
> >> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9954450
> >> The approach ist tested in V.B for 1, 10, and 100 Gb/s links on a Linux server and provides sufficiently accurate results for bandwidth utilizations of 25%. The method is likely to work also for lower utilizations, but this was not an issue in this work. The method is applicable only by a link's head-end node. It does not work for end systems to find the bottleneck bandwidth on some unknown intermediate node. However, it can deliver useful information for scheduling algorithms in forwarding nodes, which is the use case in this paper, and which may be of interest to some readers on this list.
> >>
> >> Kind regards
> >>
> >> Michael
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 01.08.2023 um 00:36 schrieb Dave Taht via Bloat:
> >>> Promising approach:
> >>>
> >>> https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10188775
> >> --
> >> Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
> >> University of Tuebingen
> >> Faculty of Science
> >> Department of Computer Science
> >> Chair of Communication Networks
> >> Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
> >> phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505
> >> fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220
> >> mailto:menth at uni-tuebingen.de
> >> http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Bloat mailing list
> >> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>
> --
> Prof. Dr. habil. Michael Menth
> University of Tuebingen
> Faculty of Science
> Department of Computer Science
> Chair of Communication Networks
> Sand 13, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
> phone: (+49)-7071/29-70505
> fax: (+49)-7071/29-5220
> mailto:menth at uni-tuebingen.de
> http://kn.inf.uni-tuebingen.de
>


-- 
Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos


More information about the Bloat mailing list