[Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets cloudflare'schristmas present

[Dave Taht]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 7:30 PM Luis A. Cornejo
<luis.a.cornejo at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well Reddit has many posts talking about noticeable performance increases for Starlink. Here is a primetime run:
>
> waveform:
> https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=333f97c7-7cbd-406c-8d9a-9f850cb5de7d

That is unquestionably the best result I have ever seen for starlink.
Are you in a position to take a packet capture
of the waveform test, or try some flent based tests?

> cloudflare attached
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:43 AM MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dave and Luis,
>>
>> Do you know if any of these tools are using ~random payloads, to defeat compression?
>>
>> UDPST has a CLI option:
>> (m)    -X           Randomize datagram payload (else zeroes)
>>
>> When I used this option testing shipboard satellite access, download was about 115kbps.
>>
>> Al
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com>
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2023 11:12 AM
>> > To: Luis A. Cornejo <luis.a.cornejo at gmail.com>
>> > Cc: Jay Moran <jay at tp.org>; Cake List <cake at lists.bufferbloat.net>; IETF IPPM
>> > WG <ippm at ietf.org>; MORTON JR., AL <acmorton at att.com>; Rpm
>> > <rpm at lists.bufferbloat.net>; bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net>;
>> > dickroy at alum.mit.edu; libreqos <libreqos at lists.bufferbloat.net>
>> > Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] [Starlink] [LibreQoS] the grinch meets
>> > cloudflare'schristmas present
>> >
>> > Either starlink has vastly improved, or the test is way off in this case.



-- 
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-6981366665607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC