[Bloat] An ACM Queue article about bloat and LibraQoS

[David Collier-Brown]

On 2024-07-15 05:18, Sebastian Moeller via Bloat wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> nice! I only would have wished for the A-grade waveform result as well, it is a bit of a downer that the last figure show the unpleasant 'before' status only.
>
> Regards
> 	Sebastian

That was a deliberate action on my part: the "after" status shows much 
smaller throughput numbers, leading observant readers to ask if 
improving latency didn't destroy one's bandwidth.

I suspect that the throughputs "with bloat" are greatly exaggerated... 
from counting the extra data that fills the bloated buffers (;-))

--dave


>
>> On 14. Jul 2024, at 23:30, David Collier-Brown via Bloat <bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>>
>> I have a new article on ACM Queue, at https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3674953
>> "If you're an ISP and all your customers hate you, take heart. This is now a solvable problem."
>> It's part of a tongue-in-cheek series called "You Don't Know Jack", and it's about Bufferbloat and the LibreQoS project.
>> --dave
>> -- 
>> David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
>> System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
>> davecb at spamcop.net | -- Mark Twain
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat at lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

-- 
David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
davecb at spamcop.net           |              -- Mark Twain