[Bloat] "Very interesting L4S presentation from Nokia Bell Labs on tap for RIPE 88 in Krakow this week! "

[Livingood, Jason]

On 5/21/24, 12:19, "Bloat on behalf of Jonathan Morton via Bloat wrote:

> Notice in particular that the only *performance* comparisons they make are between L4S and no AQM at all, not between L4S and conventional AQM - even though they now mention that the latter *exists*. 

I cannot speak to the Nokia deck. But in our field trials we have certainly compared single queue AQM to L4S, and L4S flows perform better. 

> There's also no mention whatsoever of what happens when L4S traffic meets a conventional AQM.

We also tested this and all is well; the performance of classic queue with AQM is fine. 

Jason