<div dir="ltr">Your test used a mixture of Taiwan, Japan and Dallas Texas which were the three best locations.<div><div>Ideally the test should concentrate less on Dallas/Taiwan, and more on Japan, instead of picking randomly among them.</div><div><br></div><div>I'll be adjusting the strategy to be more optimal. Then it is just a matter of adding servers.</div><div><br></div><div>Despite the non optimal choice, as I mentioned, it did test a near gigabit connection at Sony so the servers are not really lacking, just minimising the total of the latency especially for Windows clients.</div><div><div><br></div><div><div>16.83s stream0 mbits=0.52 (16% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.56 5%</div><div>16.83s stream1 mbits=0.43 (13% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.7 0%</div><div>16.83s stream2 mbits=1.94 (61% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=1.62 1%</div><div>16.83s stream3 mbits=7.3 (39% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=8.77 3%</div><div>16.83s stream4 mbits=3.46 (35% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=5.23 2%</div><div>16.83s stream5 mbits=1.36 (43% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=1.85 1%</div><div>16.83s stream6 mbits=0.78 (24% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=1.39 0%</div><div>16.83s stream7 mbits=1.62 (51% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.83 1%</div><div>16.83s stream8 mbits=0.67 (21% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.65 0%</div><div>16.83s stream9 mbits=8.64 (46% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=6.82 3%</div><div>16.83s stream10 mbits=3.81 (38% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=3.11 2%</div><div>16.83s stream11 mbits=0.27 (8% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.6 0%</div><div>16.83s stream12 mbits=1.67 (17% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=3.24 1%</div><div>16.83s stream13 mbits=5.83 (31% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=6.04 3%</div><div>16.83s stream14 mbits=3.17 (32% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=3.42 1%</div><div>16.83s stream15 mbits=3.46 (35% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=2.75 2%</div><div>16.83s stream16 mbits=1.19 (37% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.72 0%</div><div>16.83s stream17 mbits=6.07 (32% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=13.31 2%</div><div>16.83s stream18 mbits=0.8 (25% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=1.39 0%</div><div>16.83s stream19 mbits=1.44 (45% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.65 1%</div><div>16.83s stream20 mbits=4.11 (42% of 64k buffer) Changhua, Taiwan 1sec=2.37 2%</div><div>16.83s stream21 mbits=1.25 (39% of 64k buffer) Dallas, TX, USA 1sec=0.67 1%</div><div>16.83s stream22 mbits=6.13 (33% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=6.75 3%</div><div>16.83s stream23 mbits=4.12 (22% of 64k buffer) Tokyo, Japan 1sec=6.04 2%</div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 8:53 PM, dikshie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dikshie@gmail.com" target="_blank">dikshie@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Rich Brown <<a href="mailto:richb.hanover@gmail.com">richb.hanover@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Folks,<br>
><br>
> I am delighted to pass along the news that Justin has added latency measurements into the Speed Test at DSLReports.com.<br>
><br>
> Go to: <a href="https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest" target="_blank">https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest</a> and click the button for your Internet link. This controls the number of simultaneous connections that get established between your browser and the speedtest server. After you run the test, click the green "Results + Share" button to see detailed info. For the moment, you need to be logged in to see the latency results. There's a "register" link on each page.<br>
><br>
> The speed test measures latency using websocket pings: Justin says that a zero-latency link can give 1000 Hz - faster than a full HTTP ping. I just ran a test and got 48 msec latency from DSLReports, while ping <a href="http://gstatic.com" target="_blank">gstatic.com</a> gave 38-40 msec, so they're pretty fast.<br>
><br>
> You can leave feedback on this page - <a href="http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29910594-FYI-for-general-feedback-on-the-new-speedtest" target="_blank">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r29910594-FYI-for-general-feedback-on-the-new-speedtest</a> - or wait 'til Justin creates a new Bufferbloat topic on the forums.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>here from JP:<br>
<a href="http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320711" target="_blank">http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/320711</a><br>
<br>
there are not many servers in JP.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Bloat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net">Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat" target="_blank">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>