<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/04/16 07:03 PM, David
Collier-Brown wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:571567D6.3030209@rogers.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I haven't internalized this yet, but
my instantaneous reaction is:<br>
<ul>
<li> a radar screen is something people have been educated to
understand, so that's cool, and</li>
</ul>
</div>
</blockquote>
Rat's, it all went on one line. This is more like what I meant<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:571567D6.3030209@rogers.com" type="cite">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">
<ul>
<li> over time, plotting the time taken for <something>
against the load in <something>s is what capacity
planners expect to see: "_/"</li>
</ul>
<br>
--dave<br>
<br>
On 18/04/16 06:48 PM, David Lang wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:alpine.DEB.2.02.1604181539160.13992@nftneq.ynat.uz"
type="cite">On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Dave Taht wrote: <br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I have been sitting here looking at wifi
air packet captures off and <br>
on for years now, trying to come up with a representation,
over time, <br>
of what the actual airtime usage (and one day, fairness) would
look <br>
like. Believe me, looking at the captures is no fun, and (for
example) <br>
wireshark tends to misinterpret unreceived retries at
different rates <br>
inside a txop as tcp retries (which, while educational, makes
it hard <br>
to see actual retries)... <br>
<br>
Finally today, I found a conceptual model that "fits" - and
it's kind <br>
of my hope that something already out there does this from
packet <br>
captures. (?) Certainly there are lots of great pie chart
tools out <br>
there... <br>
<br>
Basically you start with a pie chart representing a fixed
amount of <br>
time - say, 128ms. Then for each device transmitting you
assign a <br>
slice of the pie for the amount of airtime used. Then, you can
show <br>
the amount of data transmitted in that piece of the pie by
increasing <br>
the volume plotted for that slice of the pie. And you sweep
around <br>
continually (like a radar scanning or a timepiece's pointer)
to show <br>
progress over time, and you show multicast and other traffic
as eating <br>
the whole pie for however long it lasts. <br>
<br>
conceptually it looks a bit like this: <br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://blog.cerowrt.org/images/fairness.png">http://blog.cerowrt.org/images/fairness.png</a>
(I borrowed this graph <br>
from
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/11/easily-create-stunning-animated-charts-with-chart-js/">http://www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/11/easily-create-stunning-animated-charts-with-chart-js/</a><br>
) <br>
<br>
Another way to do it would be to have the pie represent all
the <br>
stations on the network, and to have the "sweep hand" jump
between <br>
them... <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
does it really matter how much data is passed during the
timeslice as opposed to just how much airtime is used? (and
there will be a large chunk of airtime unused for various
reasons, much of which you will not be able to attribute to any
one station, and if you do get full transmit data from each
station, you can end up with >100% airtime use attempted) <br>
<br>
I would be looking at a stacked area graph to show changes over
time (a particular source will come and go over time) <br>
<br>
I would either do two graphs, one showing data successfully
transmitted, the other showing airtime used (keeping
colors/order matching between the two graphs), or if you have
few enough stations, one graph with good lines between the
stations and have the color represent the % of theoretical peak
data transmission to show the relative efficiency of the
different stations. <br>
<br>
<br>
While the radar sweep updating of a pie graph is a neat graphic,
it doesn't really let you see what's happening over time. <br>
<br>
David Lang <br>
<br>
_______________________________________________ <br>
Bloat mailing list <br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net">Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:davecb@spamcop.net">davecb@spamcop.net</a> | -- Mark Twain
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:davecb@spamcop.net">davecb@spamcop.net</a> | -- Mark Twain
</pre>
</body>
</html>