<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 27/08/16 18:37, Kathleen Nichols wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8971f9f1-a79b-ce49-f7c4-660a355fdd43@pollere.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">In-line below. Only for geeks.</pre>
</blockquote>
Present.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8971f9f1-a79b-ce49-f7c4-660a355fdd43@pollere.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On 8/27/16 9:03 AM, Alan Jenkins wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
That's the simplest measure of bufferbloat though :).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Don't I know! :) Have spent a couple of years figuring out how to measure
experienced delay...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Do you have a criticism in terms of dslreports.com? I think it's fairly
transparent, showing idle v.s. download v.s. upload. The headline
figures are an average, and you can look at all the data points. (You
can increase the measurement frequency if you're specifically interested
in that).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
"Criticism" seems too harsh. The uplink and downlink speed stuff is great
and agrees with all other measures. The "bufferbloat" grade is, I think,
sort
of confusing. Also, it's not clear where the queue the test builds up is
located.
It could be in ISP or home. So, I ran the test while I was also streaming a
Netflix video. Under the column "RTT/jitter Avg" the test lists values that
range from 654 to 702 with +/- 5.2 to 20.8 ms (for the four servers). I
couldn't
figure out what that means.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
My assumption is the RTT is just read out from the TCP socket, i.e.
it's one of the kernel statistics.<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16231600/fetching-the-tcp-rtt-in-linux/16232250#16232250">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16231600/fetching-the-tcp-rtt-in-linux/16232250#16232250</a><br>
<br>
Looking in `ss.c` as suggested, the second figure shown by `ss` is
`rttvar`. And that's the kernel's measure of RTT variation. If my
assumption is right, that would tell us where the "jitter" figure
comes from as well.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8971f9f1-a79b-ce49-f7c4-660a355fdd43@pollere.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> I can see the delay ramp up over the test
(the video
stream also follows that ramp though it's normal delay ranges from about
1ms to
about 40ms). If I took the RT delay experienced by the packets to/from
those servers,
I got median values between 391 and 429 ms. The IQRs were about 240ms to
536-616ms. The maximum values where all just over 700ms, agreeing with
the dslreports
number. But that number is listed as an average so I don't understand?
Also what is the
jitter. I looked around for info on the numbers but I didn't find it.
Probably I just totally
missed some obvious thing to click on.
But the thing is, I've been doing a lot of monitoring of my link and I
don't normally see
those kinds of delays. In the note I put out a bit ago, there is
definitely this bursting
behavior that is particularly indulged in by netflix and google but when
our downstream
bandwidth went up, those bursts no longer caused such long transient
delays (okay, duh).
So, I'm not sure who should be tagged as the "responsible party" for the
grade that the
test gives. Nor am I convinced that users have to assume that means they
are going to see
those kinds of delays. But this is a general issue with active measurement.
It's not a criticism of the test, but maybe of the presentation of the
result.
Kathie
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Thanks. I wasn't clear what you meant the first time, particularly
about the 40ms figure. Very comprehensive explanation of your
point.<br>
<br>
It's easy to rant about ubiquitous dumb FIFO's in consumer equipment
:). Whereas the queue on the ISP side of the link ("download"), can
be more complex and varied. Mine gets good results on
dslreports.com, but the latency isn't always so good during torrent
downloads.<br>
<br>
I do have doubts about the highly "multi-threaded" test method.
dslreports let you dial it down manually (Preferences). As you say,
a better real-world test is to just use your connection normally
& run smokeping... or an online "line monitor" like
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping">http://www.thinkbroadband.com/ping</a> :).<br>
<br>
Alan<br>
</body>
</html>