<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 06/12/2018 02:42 AM, Toke
Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:87in6ohm30.fsf@toke.dk">
<blockquote type="cite" style="color: #000000;">
<pre wrap=""><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/10-2018-05-15-bbr.pdf" moz-do-not-send="true">https://ripe76.ripe.net/presentations/10-2018-05-15-bbr.pdf</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">"More research needed". Naturally <span class="moz-smiley-s3" title=";)"><span>;)</span></span>
(But yeah, good points overall)</pre>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Interesting. Potentially, all affectuated. After having applied
the BBR 2.0, we might are back to Cubic? :D</p>
<p>Moreover, if it tends to be unstable on larger scale - what is
Google doing then? Thought they've got a more or less homogeneous
BBR driven TCP flow ecosystem - at least internally!? Was all
propaganda? When speculating, might working for them since of
centrally handled flow steering approaches - "imposing inter-flow
fairness".<br>
</p>
--
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">Besten Gruß
Matthias Tafelmeier
</pre>
</body>
</html>