<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 23, 2018, at 10:26 AM, Pete Heist <<a href="mailto:pete@heistp.net" class="">pete@heistp.net</a>> wrote:</div><div class=""><div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Dave Taht <<a href="mailto:dave.taht@gmail.com" class="">dave.taht@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">I had a chance to give a talk at broadcom recently, slides here:<br class=""><br class=""><a href="http://flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net/~d/broadcom_aug9.pdf" class="">http://flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net/~d/broadcom_aug9.pdf</a><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Thanks for sharing, this is really useful, raising awareness where it matters. Quite a bit of content... :)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Ubiquiti needs some work getting this into more of their products (EdgeMAX in particular). A good time to lobby for this might be, well a couple months ago, as they’re producing alpha builds for their upcoming 2.0 release with kernel 4.9 and new Cavium/Mediatek/Octeon SDKs. I just asked about the status in the EdgeRouter Beta forum, in case it finds the right eyes before the release:</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><a href="https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter-Beta/BQL-support/m-p/2466657" class="">https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter-Beta/BQL-support/m-p/2466657</a></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">This started a discussion, and no, so far it looks like there’s no BQL support in the upcoming 2.0 release.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">For my own benefit, re-reading the original patch series comment (<a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/" class="">https://lwn.net/Articles/469652/</a>) makes it sound like BQL is useful even without AQM (original benchmarks were done with straight pfifo_fast). I didn’t realize this, actually. If anything incorrect about BQL was said in this discussion, correct us, please… :)</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Pete</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>