<html><head></head><body>I guess the question is, what Rich needs more urgently, more aggregate rate or more single-flow performance?<br>Then for bonding one needs a dedicated head-end device on the internet side of things, while mwan3 on the router alone should work with any independent links for failover and load sharing, IIRC.<br><br>Best Regards<br> Sebastian<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 3 May 2020 16:33:56 CEST, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">not huge on bonding, simpler to just get the two uplinks and split<br>flows across them with an sqm instance for each and a tc hash<br>directing flows at one or another.<br><br>On Sun, May 3, 2020 at 7:30 AM Daniel Sterling<br><sterling.daniel@gmail.com> wrote:<br>><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> When I had both DSL and cable modem, I compiled Linux with this patch set to make multi gateway NAT work and it worked great<br><br> <a href="http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes">http://ja.ssi.bg/#routes</a><br><br> Should be able to use that plus ifb+cake on each NIC to do the right thing, aye?<br><br> As an aside, I'm kind of furious that NAT fix never got merged upstream :( it's so useful for multiple uplinks<br><br> -- Dan<br><br> On May 3, 2020, at 10:23 AM, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:<br><br> Given the crummy internet service in my area (DSL, max of 15mbps/1mbps), I wonder if we could improve things by getting a second connection from our ISP and "bonding" the two links together in my OpenWrt router.<br><br> I see both Multiwan (which is self-described as old) and mwan3.<br><br> But neither would seem to offer the kinds of latency control (SQM/fq_codel/cake) that the cool kids in networking have come to expect.<br><br> Any recommendations from this group for such an effort? Thanks.<br><br> Rich<hr> Bloat mailing list<br> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net<br> <a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a><hr> Bloat mailing list<br> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net<br> <a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a><br></blockquote><br><br></pre></blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</body></html>