<div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">El lun., 15 jun. 2020 06:15, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <<a href="mailto:toke@toke.dk">toke@toke.dk</a>> escribió:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Sergio Belkin <<a href="mailto:sebelk@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">sebelk@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
> Hi,<br>
> I've seen that many of the recommended tools to diagnose/troubleshoot<br>
> bufferbloat use netperf.<br>
> Netperf in <a href="https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://github.com/HewlettPackard/netperf</a> has many years of<br>
> inactivity. In fact, in recent versions of distros don't include it.<br>
> So, my question is: is still netperf a reliable tool?<br>
<br>
Reliable in the sense that it works and produces results that are likely<br>
to be fairly close to the reality you want to measure? Absolutely.<br>
Reliable in the sense that you can always rely on it being available?<br>
Unfortunately not.<br>
<br>
The latter is more of a licensing issue, though, which unfortunately<br>
also means that it is not likely to be fixed... :(<br>
<br>
-Toke<br></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Thanks for tour kind answers</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
</blockquote></div></div></div>