<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1256">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
The support for AQM (PIE) is mandatory in D3.1 modems regardless of the US mode in use (ie sc-qam (3.0) or ofdma (3.1) upstream)<span id="ms-outlook-android-cursor"></span>, so it should be enabled.<br>
<br>
</div>
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
<span id="OutlookSignature">
<div dir="auto" style="direction: ltr; margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 11pt; color: black; ">
Get <a href="https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg">Outlook for Android</a></div>
</span><br>
</div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" style="font-size:11pt" color="#000000"><b>From:</b> Bloat <bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net> on behalf of Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, July 6, 2021 11:13:59 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [Bloat] Really getting 1G out of ISP?</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div style="display:block!important; display:block"><style type="text/css">
<!--
div
{display:block!important}
td.x_ik-td
{display:table-cell!important;
background-color:#e2e3e5!important}
span.x_ik-banner
{display:inline!important;
background-color:#e2e3e5!important}
span.x_ik-footer
{display:inline!important;
background-color:#e2e3e5!important}
span.x_ik-initial
{display:inline!important;
background-color:initial!important}
-->
</style><!--removed inky banner--></div>
<div dir="ltr">Are these in-flux changes to where the upstream split is why some modems report DOCSIS 3.1 downstream, but only 3.0 upstream? (and therefore aren't enabling AQM on the upstream?)
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-Aaron</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="x_gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="x_gmail_attr">On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 4:04 PM Livingood, Jason via Bloat <<a href="mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net">bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="x_gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width:1px; border-left-style:solid; border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">
> For DOCSIS the issue seems to be an unfortunate frequency split between up and downstream and use of lower efficiency coding schemes.<br>
<br>
Performance really takes a big step forward once a person has a D3.1 modem in their home, bringing OFDM and OFDMA as key advancements. Also in flux at the moment is where the upstream split is in cable networks, which are moving to mid-split or high-split designs
that bring more upstream bandwidth. As well, over the past 18+ months, most cable networks have added substantially more upstream channels as well as performed quite a number of fiber node splits. And that is just below the physical layer stuff - there's also
a lot of work at the software layer for modems and CMTSes that is quite interesting.<br>
<br>
JL<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bloat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net">Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://secure-web.cisco.com/12r7ZmOFM8ddVde0m7xhKWGeITD3XE3Ac8lYCXdEv60KV7M2dP0FljB3D2Drve2H_DrbajVB3m_YObAyONExbkEVq1hasawuiwj6gKBkdsagSp44rWmPbd3AYBB3T_gqXzw5lJilH-KCga_T694ymSPplZtkdJyEPAxcl4cd1elFxGzE2cKv0yWsHC3rCkJRNvkbEzEF6BPvlI8csBxJLA8k4wOTd-SpoSvQodsyQp6X8hBDSoo-OtpI1sVvNo84-c585IlURf4pCCiQfyHZvkBMmb_Ee0STbfr_Q3Jqc0qHqn6wOImpTw5-rG0JZktn8QFfPuZHvwR2eSVSXMyNBSg/https%3A%2F%2Flists.bufferbloat.net%2Flistinfo%2Fbloat" rel="noreferrer">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>