<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.ik-banner
{mso-style-name:ik-banner;
background:#FFF3CD;}
span.ik-footer
{mso-style-name:ik-footer;
background:#FFF3CD;}
span.EmailStyle22
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="EN-IE" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Just to pull this back into context – it may well be that one ISP happens to muck around like that – however, rented/leased CMs still make up the majority of DOCSIS devices, so it is
very likely that DOCSIS AQM is enabled and operating on the majority of connected DOCSIS 3.1 devices.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB" style="mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday 7 July 2021 at 17:18<br>
<b>To: </b>"Wheelock, Ian" <ian.wheelock@commscope.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Bloat] Really getting 1G out of ISP?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-line-height-alt:.75pt;background:white"></p></div><!--removed inky banner--><p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<p style="margin:0cm">> On 7 Jul, 2021, at 12:27 pm, Wheelock, Ian <ian.wheelock@commscope.com> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm">> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm">> It is entirely possible through the mechanics of DOCSIS provisioning that AQM could be enabled or disabled on different CMs or groups of CMs. Doing so would be rather petty and may add additional unnecessary complexity to the provisioning
system. Users that own their CMs are still paying for the internet access with the specific ISP, so would likely expect equivalent performance.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm">Entirely true, but for the ISP the matter of whether the subscriber is using a rented or self-owned modem is not entirely petty - it is the difference of a line item on the monthly bill. I'm sure you can see how the perverse incentives
arise with that.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm"> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin:0cm">- Jonathan Morton<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>