<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>I used it to argue that the building network was broken at work
(the response was crickets) and in a future p99conf talk.</p>
<p>It arguably needs a second axis on the lower two graphs, with an
indication of what point which badnesses occurs.</p>
<p>--dave<br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/29/24 12:03, Dave Taht via Bloat
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAA93jw5+SOxsqcidjQezq-etL70iXg80Yee2VjFDy3nY7KB5Mw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">Neat. I ran it concurrently with a few other tests
on my starlink, with an ongoing score of excellent to good. </div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at
6:04 AM Rich Brown via Bloat <<a
href="mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I
came across an intriguing utility a while back. The "VSee
Network Stability Test" is a web page that continually
monitors the quality of your network connection so you can
determine whether your Zoom call crapped out because of a
network problem. (VSee provides telehealth services, and I
imagine they created this test so they could blame someone
else...)<br>
<br>
It appears that the test page establishes an RTC connection to
their server, and uses the response times of the traffic to
compute latency, jitter, and packet loss. It also computes MOS
score (used to rate telephone call quality) and shows all
three in graphs. Check it out at:<br>
<br>
<a href="https://test.vsee.com/network/index.html"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://test.vsee.com/network/index.html</a><br>
<br>
Although the underlying data is compelling, their web page is
as ugly as sin (at least for non-techies). I have asked VSee
whether they might be open to making changes, or if they might
make the source code available, but I think it's unlikely.<br>
<br>
Alternatively, does anyone know of an equivalent facility that
has a) a nicer web page and b) source code available? Thanks<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bloat mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br clear="all">
<div><br>
</div>
<span class="gmail_signature_prefix">-- </span><br>
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net">Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat">https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:davecb@spamcop.net">davecb@spamcop.net</a> | -- Mark Twain</pre>
</body>
</html>