[Cake] making peeling more aggressive?

[Dave Taht]

I have been running this in production.

http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/0001-make-peeling-more-aggressive.patch

It is hard to discern differences between these two variants, but I am
a big believer in trying to get the peeling threshold down below what
can be effectively scheduled by the cpu, which is less than 250us on
many platforms.

Also for those trying to make this work on current kernels, a quick
and dirty patch to get it basically running is below. If someone can
grok the new kernel hashing API enough to make it usable for cake, I'd
love it.

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:16 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> damn me, I did this patch back in early june.
>
> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/0001-hacked-to-more-or-less-support-netnext-4.2-change-in.patch
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 7:09 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke at toke.dk> wrote:
>> Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>>  want a patch
>>> I guess you
>>
>> Yes, please :)
>>
>> -Toke
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> worldwide bufferbloat report:
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
> And:
> What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
> https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast



-- 
Dave Täht
worldwide bufferbloat report:
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/results/bufferbloat
And:
What will it take to vastly improve wifi for everyone?
https://plus.google.com/u/0/explore/makewififast