[Cake] Fwd: [Codel] fq_codel_drop vs a udp flood

[Jonathan Morton]

> On 6 May, 2016, at 07:35, Dave Taht <dave.taht at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> this would be a pretty nifty feature for cake to have in this hostile universe.

Yes, but difficult to implement since the trailing fragments lose the proto/port information, and thus get sorted into a different queue than the leading fragment.  We would essentially need to implement the same tracking mechanisms as for actual reassembly.

 - Jonathan Morton